October 2016 |
How to avoid common pitfalls when managing a self-funded health plan
Author: Brady C. Bizarro, Esq. |
|
Since the passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, employers have become increasingly aware of the potential financial benefits that come with adopting a self-funded health plan.
Read the full publication |
October 2016 |
Self-Insurance: You Can Increase Benefits While Minimizing Risk
Author: Ron E. Peck, Esq. |
|
In the United States, if you have health insurance, chances are it’s through your employer. This is true, even in a post Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”) world, where individuals can choose to purchase individual policies on the so-called “exchange.” These two worlds of insurance, meanwhile, do not exist in separate universes. The insurance carriers that offer policies of “traditional” fully funded insurance to employers (policies where the carrier collects a premium and takes on all of the risk – including payment of medical bills), also underwrite the individual policies on the exchange.
Read the full publication |
October 2016 |
Self-Insurance: A Game Changer for Businesses Battling Healthcare Costs
Author: Ron E. Peck, Esq. |
|
Just a few weeks ago, a report from the Kaiser Family Foundation revealed insurance premiums for employer-sponsored family plans topped $18,000 this year. As the price of health care and health insurance skyrockets, employers and employees alike are digging deeper and asking: "What is health insurance? Is it all the same? Can we do something to save money but maintain benefits?"
Read the full publication |
September 2016 |
Think Outside of the Wrap
Author: Adam V. Russo, Esq. |
|
Networks are getting bashed every day in our industry. Some of it is justified, but some of it…not so much. I feel as if this is a recent phenomenon, but has it been going on for years? I am sure that whoever invented health plan networks saw it as a brilliant idea at the time, and so did their customers.
Read the full publication |
September 2016 |
Tips from the Pros: Why self-funding your company’s health plan is good for business
Author: Ron E. Peck, Esq. |
|
Massachusetts has a rich history. Since its founding, the United States routinely found its path lain out before it by the Commonwealth. From rebellion and the Boston Tea Party to government-monitored health insurance exchanges and RomneyCare, it often seems that where we go, others follow.
Read the full publication |
August 2016 |
Recent Challenges to the Uniform Enforcement of Subrogation and Reimbursement Provisions Under ERISA
Author: Catherine Dowie |
|
As most court cases interpreting ERISA mention, ERISA is “not a model of legislative drafting”. This sweeping and complex piece of legislation constantly seems to require clarification, particularly enforcement of plan subrogation rights under section 502(a)(3), which requires that relief sought by the plan be ‘equitable’ (as opposed to legal) in nature.
Read the full publication |
July 2016 |
A Missed Opportunity: How Massachusetts Nearly Addressed Its Hospital Pricing Problem
Author: Brady C. Bizarro, Esq. |
|
The roots of health care reform in Massachusetts stretch back to at least 2004, a time when lawmakers and industry experts were concerned with increasing uninsured rates, rising costs, free-riders, and the problem of adverse selection. The health care reform law that passed in 2006 under then-Governor Mitt Romney was intended to make the Commonwealth the first U.S. state to achieve near-universal health
insurance coverage, and it was based on the idea of managed competition.
Read the full publication |
July 2016 |
The Once and Future Law – Learning from Massachusetts’ Cost Containment Efforts
Author: Adam V. Russo, Esq. |
|
The election is over. For most of us that means a return to the status quo. We get up in the morning, we
go to work, and we look forward to dealing with healthcare reform. Speaking of The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("PPACA"), if you think that you've seen a lot of regulation over the past years... well... "you ain’t seen nothin’ yet!" As a proud resident of Massachusetts, I can say that with confidence.
Read the full publication |
June 2016 |
A Dose of Reality
Author: Ron E. Peck, Esq. |
|
Utilization review. Precertification. Medical case management. It seems as if health plans have been, for lack of a better word, micromanaging how medical care is sought and obtained by plan participants, for decades upon decades. It makes sense. Whether I’m a fully insured carrier or a self-insured plan sponsor, I know that a complicated pregnancy, chronic illness, cancer diagnosis, or any other number of conditions will seriously hurt – if not sink – my plan. So, it makes sense. It makes sense that I ask patients, providers, and everyone else to check in. Give me a heads up. Let me know what’s going on, and put an independent team in place to identify the most effective, yet cost-conscious course of care. Everyone wins.
Read the full publication |
May 2016 |
United Cuts Ties with the Exchanges – But Who is to Blame?
Author: Andrew Silverio, Esq. |
|
Late last year, UnitedHealth, the nation’s largest health insurer, warned that in 2016 it may make the decision to pull out of the Obamacare health insurance exchanges completely, starting in 2017 (it had already cut its advertising on all ACA plans). Not surprisingly, this sparked a great deal of commentary among both supporters and critics of the ACA, some leveled and thoughtful, some bordering on panic. Now, approaching the halfway point of 2016, it is becoming clear that United will make good on those representations.
Read the full publication |
April 2016 |
One Step Forward, Two Steps Back? Is repeal really the answer?
Author: Pamala Parette |
|
Watching football is one of my favorite pastimes. I enjoy closely scoring games, and a quarterback that appreciates team effort towards a defined goal. Those quarterbacks who direct their offense with an eye towards flawless execution through smart decision-making, favoring incremental gains and forward progress, rather than forcing passes down the field at the slightest amount of pressure. It is often said that football is a game of inches, and while touchdowns can (and do) result from spectacular plays; it’s called a “Hail Mary” for a reason. Wins do not have to be spectacular, and I, for one, prefer a “move the chains” approach to the game where each small success achieved leads (safely) to the ultimate goal, a touchdown and, ultimately, a win.
Read the full publication |
April 2016 |
How Powerful Is the Plan Document, Really?
Authors: Jon Jablon, Esq., and Tim Callender, Esq. |
|
A self-funded plan’s governing plan document and the Plan Administrator’s discretion used when interpreting that document are jointly considered to be somewhat like decisions issued by the United States Supreme Court – they are “the supreme law of the land.” To some extent, that can prove accurate with respect to the plan document; the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) provides that a plan document’s text must be strictly adhered to, and fiduciaries of the benefit plan are not permitted to deviate from the document’s terms.
Read the full publication |
March 2016 |
All’s Fair in Love and Subro…The Supreme Court Challenges Our Current Understanding of “Fairness”
Author: Christopher M. Aguiar, Esq. |
|
Legal writing in statutes and case law, alike, can be difficult to understand. Phrases like ‘heretofore’, and ‘notwithstanding’ often make it quite the headache to read for those with an untrained eye. Many, including much of legal academia, argue that the law is better served with clarity. With that in mind, allow me to state this as clearly as possible: on January 20th, 2016, The Supreme Court of the United States ruled that a plan participant who receives benefits from its health plan due to injuries caused by a third party, and later receives a settlement from any third party related to those injuries, may avoid reimbursing the benefit plan by simply spending the settlement money. This is true even when that plan participant knows that some or all of those settlement funds are to be reimbursed to the benefit plan, in full. And this, the Supreme Court opines, is equitable?
Read the full publication |
March 2016 |
No Standard Standard of Review
Author: Jon Jablon, Esq. |
|
It’s far from a novel concept that Plan Administrators of self-funded health plans governed solely by ERISA are subject to a fiduciary duty to prudently manage plan assets and act in the best interest of plan participants.
Read the full publication |
January 2016 |
Secrets to Making Reference-based Pricing Work
Author: Adam V. Russo, Esq. |
|
In order for reference-based pricing (RBP) to work, health plan sponsors should do it in a way that involves implementing best practices for cost analysis, claim repricing, plan design, patient advocacy (including balance billing protection when necessary), and member education.
Read the full publication |
January 2016 |
Top Ten Lessons of a Reference Based Pricer
Author: Jason Davis |
|
Where two gather to discuss reference-based pricing (“RBP”), you will have three opinions. Few would argue that the use of fixed fee schedules instead of traditional cost-containment methods (like preferred-provider organizations [“PPO”]) is not one of the (if not the) most hotly debated and misunderstood topic in our industry.
Read the full publication |
December 2015 |
Challenges to Subrogation Rights in Montanile
Author: Catherine Dowie |
|
The facts of the latest healthcare subrogation challenge on the Supreme Court’s docket (Montanile v. Board of Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Health Benefit Plan) will be familiar to many. As you may recall from our June 2015 Phia Factor article, following a motor vehicle accident, Robert Montanile’s health plan paid over $120,000 on his behalf, subject to all plan terms, including a subrogation and reimbursement provision. Mr. Montanile hired an attorney to bring a claim on his behalf, and that attorney secured a settlement of $500,000.00.
Read the full publication |
October 2015 |
Cracking the Code: ICD-10 is Upon Us!
Author: Andrew Silverio, Esq. |
|
ICD-9, the now ubiquitous method of categorizing disease and injury, was adopted in the United States in 1979, and has been the standard for decades. Every medical provider, health plan, insurance adjuster, or claims processor encounters ICD-9 codes regularly, if not on a daily basis. All of that is about to change.
Read the full publication |
October 2015 |
Fundamental Rights and Vague Responsibilities.
Author: Jon Jablon, Esq. and Kelly E. Dempsey, Esq. |
|
No matter your opinion on Obergefell v. Hodges – the recent Supreme Court case holding that interpreted the fourteenth amendment as granting same-sex couples the right to marry – it is undeniably an important occurrence in our country’s culture. While this holding will have profound impacts on many lives, its effects are not quite limited to simply the act of marriage. For instance, areas of the law that will be changed include bankruptcy law, Medicare entitlement, wills and inheritances, taxes – and health plans.
Read the full publication |
October 2015 |
Case Study – How Current Market Assumptions Are Harmful for Our Industry.
Author: Adam Russo, Esq. |
|
If a Tree Falls…
On June 23, 2015 a very interesting case was allowed to proceed in the United States District Court in New Jersey entitled Johnson & Towers, Inc. v. Corporate Synergies Group, LLC. Although my mind was blown away by this case, I saw very little discussion across the industry. It was almost as if a large tree had fallen in an empty forest. It’s been two months and there have been no bulletins, no strategies in place to deal with this case and the potential outcomes, no warnings to association members…nothing!
Read the full publication |
October 2015 |
Why Are Hospital Charges So High? Because Nobody Questions Them
Author: Adam Russo, Esq. |
|
When the Consumer Doesn’t Care What it Costs…
When a friend of mine with quality health insurance received his hospital bill, what did he do? He opened the statement and looked at one thing – his amount due. This dollar figure isn’t $30,000 or even $8,000; it’s the amount of the co-pay or deductible on his in- network claim. Typically, we are talking about anywhere from $5 to $250 – this is all he cares about and also why we have major problems with our healthcare system today. He doesn’t know or care that the charges were $140,000 and that his self-funded health plan (even after the great discount) paid $110,000, even though the actual cost of the hospital services was less than $20,000. If he had walked in with a Medicare card, the hospital would have been paid $25,000. The worst part of this horror story was that he complained to me for having to pay a $200 co-payment even though he has full health insurance coverage.
Read the full publication |
September 2015 |
The Real Causes of High Healthcare Costs
Author: Adam V. Russo, Esq. |
|
Adam Russo, Esq., Co-Founder and CEO of The Phia Group LLC, discussed what “insurance” means to the various buyers of healthcare, and why understanding what costs mean to different players in the healthcare system is essential to guiding meaningful reform around transparency and healthcare cost containment. Following is a summary of his talk at the Free Market Medicine Association (FMMA) 2015 Conference in Oklahoma City, OK.
Read the full publication |
July 2015 |
The Road to Recovery: Subrogation Gets Its Day In Court … Again
Author: Christopher M. Aguiar, Esq. |
|
In a country with a seemingly infinite amount of regulation and concerns regarding benefit plan compliance following the passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, one would expect much attention from courts in the employee sponsored health benefits arena. Most might be surprised when they realize the amount of attention that subrogation has received in The Supreme Court of the United States, the highest court in the land, over the last 25 years.
Read the full publication |
July 2015 |
Ready or Not, Here it Comes! The Employer Mandate is Finally Applicable
Author: Kelly E. Dempsey, Esq. |
|
The Employer Shared Responsibility provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) went into effect for certain applicable large employers on January 1, 2015.[1] The Employer Shared Responsibility provision is often referred to as Pay or Play, the Employer Mandate, or 4980H subsections (a) and (b). The applicability date of the Employer Shared Responsibility provision (“Employer Mandate”) depends on an employer’s size, as well as, whether or not the plan is a non-calendar year plan and meets the non-calendar year plan transition relief (provided by the final regulations issue on February 12, 2014.
Read the full publication |
April 2015 |
Implant Wars
Author: Jason Davis |
|
Despite a reported downturn in inflation, US Healthcare continues to produce shocking examples of out-of-control costs. This reality is clearly seen in the treatment of musculoskeletal diseases. All told, the total direct costs are estimated at over $500 billion per year and rising.
Read the full publication |