Home
+
About Us
Welcome Video
Company Overview
Our Purpose
A Message from our CEO
Testimonials
+
Leadership
Executive Team
Legal Team
Careers
Giving Back
Locations
Contact
Phia Certification
Diversity & Inclusion
Privacy Statement
Covid-19 Resources
+
Services
Learn - Independent Consultation & Evaluation
Plan - Phia Document Management
Plan - Plan Drafting Services
Save - Claims, Recovery & Subrogation Services
Save - Claim Negotiation
Save - Phia Unwrapped
Protect - Plan Appointed Claim Evaluator (PACE)
Protect - Patient Defender & Balance Billing
Phia International
-
Media
Covid-19
Webinars
Newsletters
Publications
Blog
Press Releases
Podcasts
Industry Terms
Guide to Understanding Subrogation
Moving To Self-Funded Health Plan Guide
Referenced-Based Pricing Explained
Hospital Price Transparency Guide
Balance-Billing: What Patients Need To Know
+
Members Area
+
FAQs
FAQ - Subrogation & Reimbursement
FAQ - Mass Tort Subrogation & Reimbursement
Questionnaire Response
Make A Payment
888-986-0080
info@phiagroup.com
Questionnaire Response
Blog
|
Login
Home
About Us
Welcome Video
Company Overview
Our Purpose
A Message from our CEO
Testimonials
Leadership
Executive Team
Legal Team
Careers
Giving Back
Locations
Contact
Phia Certification
Diversity & Inclusion
Privacy Statement
Covid-19 Resources
Services
Learn - Independent Consultation & Evaluation
Plan - Phia Document Management
Plan - Plan Drafting Services
Save - Claims, Recovery & Subrogation Services
Save - Claim Negotiation
Save - Phia Unwrapped
Protect - Plan Appointed Claim Evaluator (PACE)
Protect - Patient Defender & Balance Billing
Phia International
Media
Covid-19
Webinars
Newsletters
Publications
Blog
Press Releases
Podcasts
Industry Terms
Guide to Understanding Subrogation
Moving To Self-Funded Health Plan Guide
Referenced-Based Pricing Explained
Hospital Price Transparency Guide
Balance-Billing: What Patients Need To Know
Members Area
FAQs
FAQ - Subrogation & Reimbursement
FAQ - Mass Tort Subrogation & Reimbursement
Questionnaire Response
Make A Payment
Posts
Media
>
Posts
Covid-19
Webinars
Newsletters
Publications
Blog
Press Releases
Podcasts
Industry Terms
Guide to Understanding Subrogation
Moving To Self-Funded Health Plan Guide
Referenced-Based Pricing Explained
Hospital Price Transparency Guide
Balance-Billing: What Patients Need To Know
Phia Group Media
Phia Group Media
U.S. Airways v. McCutchen – Where Are they Now?
On March 29, 2017 in
Affordable Care Act
,
Blog
,
Self Funding
,
Self Insurance
,
Subrogation
By: Chris Aguiar, Esq.
The health benefits industry can feel like a whirlwind, especially for self-funded plans. We always seem to be running around trying to figure out how to comply with the law, only to have it change and start the cycle all over again. We are experiencing this as we speak with the Affordable Care Act (a.k.a. Obamacare) and its possible successor, the American Health Care Act. As a result, we tend to move on from issues more quickly once they seem to be resolved even though perhaps they linger.
Remember McCutchen? In the subrogation world, U.S. Airways v. McCutchen was a big deal. It finally answered the question that every benefit plan, TPA, and recovery vendor was fighting over since the beginning of time on their subrogation cases; can a court override the terms of a private, self-funded benefit plan under the purview of ERISA? U.S. Airways lost the case, but the decision that now clarified and established the law was clear; specific unambiguous plan language rules the day. Of course, the Montanile decision threw a bit of a curveball into our world, but that’s a blog post for another day. Fast forward almost four years (that’s right, the Supreme Court decision in McCutchen came down in 2013 – can you believe it was already that long ago?); does anyone know what happened to U.S. Airways?
In addition to what turned out to be the main issue in the McCutchen case, that the plan terms were not good enough for the Third Circuit, there were many more issues to consider when the case was remanded (i.e. sent back) to the lower courts for additional findings. As it turned out, U.S. Airways utilized BOTH a Summary Plan Description (SPD) and a Plan Document (PD). That alone was not the kiss of death, but the SPD explicitly provided that the terms in the PD controlled if there was a conflict. Unfortunately for them, there was! The SPD provided for recovery from McCutchen’s underinsured motorist coverage (UIM), but the PD did not. Since the PD was the controlling document in that case, U.S. Airways was not entitled to a recovery against the UIM.
So what was the ultimate outcome? U.S. Airways was entitled to assert its $64,000.00 lien against $10,000.00 in liability coverage rather than against $100,000.00 in UIM coverage. It is important to know all of the facts and understand all of the factors that might impact your case. As we saw in U.S. Airways v. McCutchen – language in the SPD and/or PD was deficient and contradictory – and that led to U.S. Airways losing out on recoveries as well as the costs of bringing those actions. Every case is different, and every entity has its own motivations as to why they engage in litigation, but it is important to make sure you have all your ducks in a row and that you have the tools needed to actually win the fight, or you might get stuck holding the bag. The McCutchen case helps us in the subrogation world every single day because of what the Supreme Court ultimately held, but the law can change on any given day. Make sure you are prepared for the whirlwind!
Tagged With:
Self Funding